Question

A messy desk can actually lead people towards clearer thinking, say researchers from Germany．

The researchers found in a series of linked studies - using a messy desk and a messy shop front - that people actually thought more clearly when all around was chaos, as they sought to simplify the tasks at hand.

Visual and mental clutter（阻塞） forces human beings to focus and think more clearly.

Famous thinkers and writers such as Albert Einstein and Roald Dahl have been notorious（聲名狼藉的） for their untidy desks.

“Messy desks may not be as detrimental（有害的） as they appear to be, as the problem-solving approaches they seem to cause can improve work efficiency or increase employees' creativity in problem solving,” say the authors.

“Business and government managers often promote 'clean desk' policies to avoid disorganized offices and messy desks, for the purpose of boosting work efficiency and productivity,” writes lead researcher Jia Liu of the University of Groningen in a paper published in the Journal of Consumer Research.

“This practice is based on the conventional wisdom that a disorganized and messy environment can clutter one's mind and complicate one's judgments.”

“However, not all evidence supports this conventional link between a messy environment and a messy mind.”

The scientists tested people's response in various 'messy' environments - including a messy shop front, a disorganized desk, and even a work environment where a language task 'reminded' people of messiness.

The authors found in the series of six studies people tended towards simplicity in their thinking.

“They categorized （分類(lèi)） products in a simpler manner, were willing to pay more for a T-shirt that shows a simple-looking picture, and sought less variety in their choices.” said the researchers.

1. The purpose of the first two paragraphs is to show that _____．

A．A messy desk cannot contribute to clearer thinking

B．People thought more clearly about a messy desk and a shop front

C．People will feel confused when all around are chaos

D．People manage to simplify the tasks in messy environments

2. Why does the author take Albert Einstein as an example?

A．to support the idea that clearer thinking comes from messy environment．

B．to tell the fact that Einstein was known for his untidy desks．

C．to stop us from learning from Albert Einstein．

D．to call on us to develop a good habit．

3.How do people look at messy environment according to the conventional wisdom?

A．Messy environment will create clearer thinking．

B．Messy environment will simplify one' s judgment．

C．Messy environment can promote work efficiency．

D．Messy environment can block one' s mind．

4. What does the last paragraph imply?

A．People believe messy environment creates clearer thinking．

B．People sought more simplicity in the choices．

C．People were not willing to choose those complicated products．

D．Not all the people accept messy environment and complicated things

 

Answer 1

【答案】

1.B

2.A

3.D

4.D

【解析】

試題分析：本文敘述了德國(guó)的研究人員日前表示，凌亂的辦公桌其實(shí)可以讓員工思維更清晰。視覺(jué)和心理的雜亂會(huì)迫使人們集中精力，而且更能理清思路。

1.段落大意題。根據(jù)The researchers found in a series of linked studies - using a messy desk and a messy shop front - that people actually thought more clearly when all around was chaos,研究人員發(fā)現(xiàn)在一系列相連的研究——使用一個(gè)凌亂的書(shū)桌和一個(gè)混亂的店面——實(shí)際上人們的思想更加清楚，故選B。

2.細(xì)節(jié)理解題。根據(jù)來(lái)支持他的觀點(diǎn)凌亂的環(huán)境而是思維更加清晰，故選A。

3.細(xì)節(jié)理解題。根據(jù)This practice is based on the conventional wisdom that a disorganized and messy environment can clutter one's mind and complicate one's judgments故選 D。

4.推理判斷題。根據(jù)并不是所有的人接受混亂的環(huán)境和變復(fù)雜的事情，故選D。

考點(diǎn)：科普類(lèi)短文閱讀。

點(diǎn)評(píng)：文章由若干段話組成，要求給每段話歸納段落大意，意即找出該段的中心思想、主旨。本題型不是讓你寫(xiě)出每段話的段落大意，這樣不好評(píng)判對(duì)錯(cuò)。而是要求從選項(xiàng)列表中選擇。在現(xiàn)在的考試中，選項(xiàng)的數(shù)目往往大大多于文章中段落的數(shù)目，也就是說(shuō)，有很多干擾選項(xiàng)。讀每段話時(shí)，要抓住該段話的主題句和核心詞匯，正確答案常常是主題句的改寫(xiě)。讀每段話時(shí)，并不是該段話全要仔細(xì)閱讀。這樣，既浪費(fèi)時(shí)間，也不容易抓住重點(diǎn)。應(yīng)該抓住該段話的主題句。