Question

There were times it was only schoolchildren who felt sick before they got their grades. But now teachers in Germany are scared, too, as they are being graded by their students.
Many teachers are opposed to it. They don’t mind being evaluated(評價). But they are upset because the results are then being posted on the Internet and accessible to millions of Internet users. On the website www.spickmich.deduring the past four months students have posted evaluation of 100,000 teachers.
The teachers are graded on categories such as “motivated”, “good instruction”, “easy examinations”, or even “sexy”. Many teachers think that their privacy has been violated.
The creators of the website say that the students are only being offered the chance to provide teachers with some feedback about their classroom instruction. Bernd Dicks, who founded the website with three friends, says that the students are largely quite satisfied with their teachers. On a grading scale of one to six, the teachers’ average grade is 2.7 and it has been improving lately. He often says the impression is that students are bullying（威嚇） their teachers. But there is also bullying of the students by teachers.
“Teachers must also learn to live with criticism,” he added. But still, the website is not totally immune from manipulation(操縱), as one teacher near the northern city of Hanover recently proved. He registered himself on the website as a student and then rated his own teaching colleagues highly. Within a few days, seven of his colleagues were listed in the top 10 ranking of Germany’s best teachers.
小題1:Many teachers are opposed to the website because_____.

A．their privacy has been violated	B．they are afraid of being assessed
C．their evaluations are unfair	D．the results are not satisfying

小題2:We can infer that the founder of the website intended to _____.

A．get the students to know their teachers better

B．conduct a survey on teachers’ performance

C．help the teachers to improve their teaching

D．change the teachers’ ways of giving instructions

小題3:From what the teacher in Hanover did, we can infer _____.

A．he intended to help his colleague

B．there was some disadvantage of the website

C．his colleagues were more popular than him

D．he wanted to know how he was evaluated

Answer 1

小題1:A
小題2:C
小題3:B

試題分析：本文就德國的老師被學生評價然后結果被公布在網站上一事，本文就這個問題列出它的優(yōu)點及缺點，這樣做引起了老師的不滿，他們不是不愿讓學生評價，而是不愿讓結果公布在網上。這就引起了有這樣一個老師以學生的名譽給自己及其他老師評出最好的成績，因而對網站不能制止這種行為而提出不滿。
小題1:這是細節(jié)理解題。根據(jù)Many teachers think that their privacy has been violated.故選A。
小題2:這是推理判斷題。根據(jù)On a grading scale of one to six, the teachers’ average grade is 2.7 and it has been improving lately.老師的被評估的平均分提高了，說明有助于老師們改進教學，故選C。
小題3:這是推理判斷題。根據(jù)He registered himself on the website as a student and then rated his own teaching colleagues highly. Within a few days, seven of his colleagues were listed in the top 10 ranking of Germany’s best teachers.
網站不能確認對老師的評價真的來自學生，故選B。
點評：推理判斷就是根據(jù)作者的意圖和傾向來完成相關的問題。 根據(jù)你對文章的理解，來判斷各個選項的正誤。最重要的就是讀懂句子的意思，找出文章的中心，這種閱讀是深層閱讀，但是你最重要的就是找出文章的中心意思，抓住主要句子和相關句子的意思就可以解決了，要注意題目中的一些關鍵詞和文章中的句子的對比，尤其是一些轉折詞、連詞等等。