Question

去年，上海復(fù)旦大學(xué)開始通過面試自主招收學(xué)生，今年又有一些學(xué)校加入到這一行列。這一新的招生方式在學(xué)生中引發(fā)了一場(chǎng)討論。假如你是李華，請(qǐng)根據(jù)下表提供的內(nèi)容給二十一世紀(jì)報(bào)編輯寫一封信反映討論情況。

60% 的學(xué)生贊成	40%的學(xué)生反對(duì)
1．面試可以全面綜合地評(píng)價(jià)一個(gè)學(xué)生； 2.鼓勵(lì)學(xué)生發(fā)展個(gè)性和特長(zhǎng)； 3．社會(huì)需要一種更加開放和有效的錄取方式。	1.面試帶有主觀性、片面性，可能不公正； 2.并非所有學(xué)生都擅于在面試中展示自己； 3.不可能在3-5分鐘內(nèi)評(píng)價(jià)一個(gè)人。

3comprehensive綜合的，subjective主觀的one-sided片面的evaluate評(píng)價(jià)   

Answer 1

Dear Editor,
Recently, a discussion has been held in our school on whether it is reasonable for the universities to admit students through interviews. The results are as follows:
60% of the students support this action. They express that interviews can evaluate a student in a more thorough and comprehensive way. It can encourage students to develop their own interests and personalities. What’s more, with the development of society, a more open and efficient way to test a student’s abilities is needed.
On the other hand, the other 40% students are against this idea. They argue that first, interviews may be subjective and one-sided, which could lead to unfairness. Second, not all students are good at showing their talents in interviews. Last but not least, a student can’t be judged in only three or five minutes.

解析