閱讀理解。
Bicycle tour and race 
    A bike tour and race will be held on August 26 and 27 (Sat. &Sun.) at 5:30 am, the riders will leave Tian'an
Men Square and ride the first 35 kilometers as a training leg. Then the next 55 kilometers leg, from Yanjiao to
Jixian, will be the first competitive (比賽的) part of the tour. The riders and their bikes will then be taken from
Jixian to Changli.
    The second racing leg of the tour will be from Changli to seaside of Nandaihe, covering a distance of 20
kilometers. Saturday night includes the stay at Nandaihe and supper. Sunday morning is free for play at the
seaside. At noon all the people and their bikes will be taken back to Beijing.
    Cost: 200 yuan
    Telephone: 4675027
Brazilian footballers
    The Brazilian Football Club play Beijing Guo'an Team at the Workers Stadium on August 26.The club has
four nation team players. Also coming is 1994 US World Cup star Ronario who has promised to play for at
least 45 minutes.
    Ticket prices: 60,100, 150 yuan
    Time /date: 4:30 pm, August 26 (Sat.)
    Telephone: 5012372
Rocking climbing
    The third National Rock Climbing Competition will be held on August 26~27 at the Huairou Mountain-
climbing Training Base. More than 10 teams from Beijing, Wuhan, Dalian, Jilin and other places will take part
in it. A Japanese team will give an exhibition climbing. Free for spectators (觀眾).
    Take a long-distance bus from Dongzhimen to Huairou.
    Time/Date: 9~12 am, August 26 and 27
    Telephone: 7143177, 7144850 Wang Zhenghua
1. The main purpose of announcing the above events is to give information about _____.
[     ]
A. visiting teams
B. famous players
C. things to do for the weekend
D. prices to pay for the sports events.
2. If you take part in the bike tour, you will ride for _____.
[     ]
A. 110 kilometers
B. 55 kilometers
C. 75 kilometers
D. 35 kilometers
3. What is special about the rock climbing competition?
[     ]
A. You don't have to be a sportsman to take part in.
B. You can watch it without paying.
C. The bus trip to the places of the competition is free.
D. Many foreign teams take part in it.
4. If you want to do something on Saturday afternoon, which telephone number will you call?
[     ]
A. 7144850
B. 7143177
C. 4675027
D. 5012372
練習(xí)冊(cè)系列答案
相關(guān)習(xí)題

科目：高中英語 來源：江西省宜春中學(xué)2011屆高三10月月考英語試卷 題型：050

閱讀理解

　　Is it time to kick Russia out of the BRICs(金磚四國(guó))?If so, it may end up sounding like a famous ball-point pen maker-BIC．An argument is being made that Goldman Sach's famous marketing device(策略),the BRICs, should really be the BICs．

　　“Is Russia really worth the name BRICs?”asks Anders Aslund, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, in an article for Foreigh Policy．Aslund, who is also co-author with Andrew Kuchins of“The Russian Balance Sheet”, thinks the Russia of Putin and Medvedev is just not worthy of inclusion alongside Brazil, India and China in the list of future economic powerhouses．He writes：

　　“The country's economic performance has fallen to such a weak level that one must ask whether it has any say at all on the global economy, compared with the other members of its group．I have just returned from Moscow, which is always dull around this season．For the last seven years, Russia has taken very few measures to improve its economy．Instead, the state has been living on oil and gas．”

　　Economically, Aslund has the numbers on his side．The International Monetary Fund figures that the Russian economy will fall by 6.7 percent in 2009, while China will grow 8.5 percent and India 5.4 percent．There is less of a case for Brazil, with a fall of 0.7 percent, but it is still doing far better than Russia．

　　But the BRICs are not just about economy．As is mentioned above, it is a marketing device to encourage investors to focus on the big promising players．From an investment standpoint, it could be argued that Russia is leading the BRICs．Its stock(股票)market is up 128 percent this year while around 80 percent is for the other three．

　　At very least, however, Russia's economic underperformance and stock market outperfoumance does suggest it is indeed one of the group．

(1)

According to the passage, which country will enjoy the biggest increase in 2009?

[　　]

A．

China．

B．

Russia．

C．

Brazil．

D．

India．

(2)

According to Aslund, Russia shouldn't be a BRIC partly because ________．

[　　]

A．

Russia's economic performance is far worse than the other three

B．

Russia's leaders are not good at managing economy

C．

Russia has taken effective measures to improve its economy

D．

Russia will no longer attract investors from other countries

(3)

From the passage we know that ________．

[　　]

A．

Anders Aslund is working for the Russian government

B．

Russia outperfoumed the other three countries in stock market

C．

most people disagree Russia is included in BRICs

D．

the BRICs would end up being the BICs sooner or later

(4)

The author seems to ________．

[　　]

A．

suggest it's time to kick Russia out of the BRICs?

B．

feel worried about the economy of the BRICs

C．

think Russia is worth being one of the group

D．

show disappointment to Russia's economy

查看答案和解析>>

科目：高中英語 來源：湖北省“9＋4”聯(lián)合體2010－2011學(xué)年高二下學(xué)期期中聯(lián)考英語試題 題型：050

閱讀理解

　　Is it time to kick Russia out of the BRICs(金磚四國(guó))?If so, it may end up sounding like a famous ball-point pen maker－BIC．An argument is being made that Goldman Sach's famous marketing device(策略), the BRICs, should really be the BICs．

　　“Is Russia really worth the name BRICs?”asks Anders Aslund, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, in an article for Foreign Policy．Aslund, who is also co-author with Andrew Kuchins of“The Russian Balance Sheet”, thinks the Russia of Putin and Medvedev is just not worthy of inclusion alongside Brazil, India and China in the list of future economic powerhouses．He writes：

　　“The country's economic performance has fallen to such a weak level that one must ask whether it has any say at all on the global economy, compared with the other members of its group．I have just returned from Moscow, which is always dull around this season．For the last seven years, Russia has taken very few measures to improve its economy．Instead, the state has been living on oil and gas．”

　　Economically, Aslund has the numbers on his side．The International Monetary Fund figures that the Russian economy will fall by 6.7 percent in 2009, while China will grow 8.5 percent and India 5.4 percent．There is less of a case for Brazil, with a fall of 0.7 percent, but it is still doing far better than Russia．

　　But the BRICs are not just about economy．As is mentioned above, it is a marketing device to encourage investors(投資者)to focus on the big promising players．From an investment standpoint, it could be argued that Russia is leading the BRICs．Its stock market is up 128 percent this year while around 80 percent is for the other three．

　　At very least, despite Russia's economic underperformance, its stock market outperformance does suggest it is indeed one of the group．

(1)

According to the passage, which country will enjoy the biggest increase in 2009?

[　　]

A．

China

B．

Russia

C．

Brazil

D．

India

(2)

According to Aslund, Russia shouldn't be a BRIC partly because ________．

[　　]

A．

its economic performance is worse than that of the others

B．

its leaders are not good at managing economy

C．

it has taken effective measures to improve its economy

D．

it will no longer attract investors from other countries

(3)

From the passage we know that ________．

[　　]

A．

Anders Aslund is working for the Russian government

B．

Russia outperformed the other three countries in stock market

C．

most people disagree Russia is included in the BRICs

D．

the BRICs would end up being the BICs sooner or later

(4)

The author seems to ________．

[　　]

A．

suggest it's time to kick Russia out of the BRICs

B．

feel worried about the economy of the BRICs

C．

think Russia is worth being one of the group

D．

show disappointment to Russia's economy

查看答案和解析>>

科目：高中英語 來源：山東省泗水一中2010-2011學(xué)年高二下學(xué)期期末考試英語試卷 題型：050

閱讀理解

　　Is it time to kick Russia out of the BRICs(金磚四國(guó))?If so, it may end up sounding like a famous ball-point pen maker－BIC．An argument is being made that Goldman Sach’s famous marketing device(策略), the BRICs, should really be the BICs．

　　“Is Russia really worth the name BRICs?” asks Anders Aslund, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, in an article for Foreign Policy．Aslund, who is also co-author with Andrew Kuchins of “The Russian Balance Sheet”, thinks the Russia of Putin and Medvedev is just not worthy of inclusion alongside Brazil, India and China in the list of future economic powerhouses．He writes：

　　“The country’s economic performance has fallen to such a weak level that one must ask whether it has any say at all on the global economy, compared with the other members of its group．I have just returned from Moscow, which is always dull around this season．For the last seven years, Russia has taken very few measures to improve its economy．Instead, the state has been living on oil and gas．”

　　Economically, Aslund has the numbers on his side．The International Monetary Fund figures that the Russian economy will fall by 6．7 percent in 2009, while China will grow 8．5 percent and India 5．4 percent．There is less of a case for Brazil, with a fall of 0．7 percent, but it is still doing far better than Russia．

　　But the BRICs are not just about economy．As is mentioned above, it is a marketing device to encourage investors(投資者)to focus on the big promising players．From an investment standpoint, it could be argued that Russia is leading the BRICs．Its stock market is up 128 percent this year while around 80 percent is for the other three．

　　At very least, despite Russia’s economic underperformance, its stock market outperformance does suggest it is indeed one of the group．

(1)

According to the passage, which country will enjoy the biggest increase in 2009?

[　　]

A．

China

B．

Russia

C．

Brazil

D．

India

(2)

According to Aslund, Russia shouldn’t be a BRIC partly because _________．

[　　]

A．

its economic performance is worse than that of the others

B．

its leaders are not good at managing economy

C．

it has taken effective measures to improve its economy

D．

it will no longer attract investors from other countries

(3)

From the passage we know that _________．

[　　]

A．

Anders Aslund is working for the Russian government

B．

Russia outperformed the other three countries in stock market

C．

most people disagree Russia is included in the BRICs

D．

the BRICs would end up being the BICs sooner or later

(4)

The author seems to _________．

[　　]

A．

suggest it’s time to kick Russia out of the BRICs

B．

feel worried about the economy of the BRICs

C．

think Russia is worth being one of the group

D．

show disappointment to Russia’s economy

查看答案和解析>>

科目：高中英語 來源：0103 月考題 題型：閱讀理解

閱讀理解。
     Is it time to kick Russia out of the BRICs (金磚四國(guó))? If so, it may end up sounding like a famous
ball-point pen maker-BIC. An argument is being made that Goldman Sach's famous marketing device
(策略), the BRICs, should really be the BICs.
     "Is Russia really worth the name BRICs?" asks Anders Aslund, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute
for International Economics, in an article for Foreign Policy. Aslund, who is also co-author with Andrew
Kuchins of  "The Russian Balance Sheet", thinks the Russia of Putin and Medvedev is just not worthy of
inclusion alongside Brazil, India and China in the list of future economic powerhouses. He writes:
     "The country's economic performance has fallen to such a weak level that one must ask whether it has
any say at all on the global economy, compared with the other members of its group. I have just returned
from Moscow, which is always dull around this season. For the last seven years, Russia has taken very
few measures to improve its economy. Instead, the state has been living on oil and gas."
     Economically, Aslund has the numbers on his side. The International Monetary Fund figures that the
Russian economy will fall by 6.7 percent in 2009, while China will grow 8.5 percent and India 5.4 percent.
There is less of a case for Brazil, with a fall of 0.7 percent, but it is still doing far better than Russia.
     But the BRICs are not just about economy. As is mentioned above, it is a marketing device to encourage
investors (投資者)to focus on the big promising players. From an investment standpoint, it could be argued
that Russia is leading the BRICs. Its stock (股票) market is up 128 percent this year while around 80 percent
is for the other three.
     At very least, however, Russia's economic underperformance and stock market outperformance does suggest it is indeed one of the group.
1. According to the passage, which country will enjoy the biggest increase in 2009?
A. China.
B. Russia.
C. Brazil.
D. India.
2. According to Aslund, Russia shouldn't be a BRIC partly because _____.
A. Russia's economic performance is far worse than the other three
B. Russia's leaders are not good at managing economy
C. Russia has taken effective measures to improve its economy
D. Russia will no longer attract investors from other countries
3. From the passage we know that _____.
A. Anders Aslund is working for the Russian government
B. Russia outperformed the other three countries in stock market
C. most people disagree Russia is included in BRICs
D. the BRICs would end up being the BICs sooner or later
4. The author seems to _____.
A. suggest it's time to kick Russia out of the BRICs?
B. feel worried about the economy of the BRICs
C. think Russia is worth being one of the group
D. show disappointment to Russia's economy

查看答案和解析>>

同步練習(xí)冊(cè)答案