Most students think my reasons for this rule include negative experiences in the past when students made wrong use of technology. There’s a bit of truth to that. I’ve seldom had students make wrong use of technology in my classes; however, I have been e-mailed by students while they were in other teachers’ classrooms.
Some students think that I am anti-technology. There’s no truth in that at all. As I noted above, I love technology and try to keep up with it.
The real reason why I ask students to leave technology at the door is I think there are very few places in which we can have deep conversations. Interruptions (中斷) by technology often break students’ thoughts and make them depend too much on outside information for ideas. I want students to dig deep in themselves for ideas. I want them to push each other to think differently and to make connections between the course material and the class discussion.
I have been teaching my history class in this way for many years and the evaluations (評價) show student satisfaction with the environment that I create. Students realize with deep conversation and difficult tasks, they learn at a deeper level – a level that helps them keep the course material beyond the classroom.
I am not saying that I won’t ever change my mind about technology use in my history class, but until I hear a really good reason for the change, I will continue my plan. A few hours of technology-free dialogue is just too sweet to give up.
1.The writer’s rule for his History Matters class is ____.
A. discussing historical ideas deeply
B. studying and discussing the materials
C. leaving technology out of the classroom
D. making right use of technology in class
2.The word “negative” in Paragraph 3 means ____.
A. similar B. unforgettable C. special D. unpleasant
3.What can we know from the passage?
A. Students make right use of technology in other teachers’ classes.
B. The classroom is one of the good places to have deep conversations.
C. The writer encourages students to agree with others after discussion.
D. Students are unhappy with the writer’s way of teaching history.
4.The writer wants to tell us that ____.
A. technology has different influences in different classes in college
B. technology makes it difficult to have true communication in class
C. history classes can help students to develop their deep thinking
D. it is time for him to give up his teaching method in history class
1.C
2.D
3.B
4.B
【解析】
試題分析:短文大意:本文介紹了作者教歷史課的一種特殊方法,不允許學生在課堂上使用計算機、平板、電話等現(xiàn)代工具而是讓他們深入挖掘自己的想法,不要過分依賴外部信息。
1.細節(jié)理解題。根據(jù)第二段第四句話I have a rule – no computers,ipads,phones,etc可知選C。
2.詞義猜測題。根據(jù)第二段最后一句when students were told my rules,some of them were not happy并結(jié)合該詞所在句子便可推知選D。
3.細節(jié)理解題。根據(jù)第六段末Students realize with deep conversation and difficult tasks, they learn at a deeper level – a level that helps them keep the course material beyond the classroom可知選B。
4.細節(jié)理解題。通讀短文可知科技使得很難在課堂上有真正的溝通,所以選B。
考點:教育類閱讀。
科目:初中英語 來源:2007年浙江省溫州市初中畢業(yè)生學業(yè)考試英語試卷(附答案) 題型:050
|
查看答案和解析>>
湖北省互聯(lián)網(wǎng)違法和不良信息舉報平臺 | 網(wǎng)上有害信息舉報專區(qū) | 電信詐騙舉報專區(qū) | 涉歷史虛無主義有害信息舉報專區(qū) | 涉企侵權(quán)舉報專區(qū)
違法和不良信息舉報電話:027-86699610 舉報郵箱:58377363@163.com